Results 1 to 10 of 59
Thread: TV vs TS
-
12-15-2012 #1
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- London, UK
- Posts
- 214
TV vs TS
Hi guys (in the non-gender specific sense!),
I've been searching through some ts and general dating sites and when searching I am constantly seeing TV results that i really don't want to see when I am seeking TS results.
Similarly, some tv's only like guys who like 'guy' type girls or actual guys and so a massive flaw continues to exist in the websites.
Who finds this an issue? Who thinks this should not be an issue?
I have very particular tastes and if i didn't have to filter through blatantly unsuitable prospects I would be on other sites or using the site VERY differently.
For the purposes of superceding discussion, I understand a 'ts' to be tits, and curves with cock against 'tv' which is generally man-in-wig.
Please people, offer your thoughts.
-
12-15-2012 #2
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 4,400
Re: TV vs TS
Birchplace's Detailed Search has the ability to search by TV and/or pre-op TS and/or post-op TS but they've throttled the results so you have to cough-up money to get the full results as a Gold Member.
-
12-15-2012 #3
Re: TV vs TS
I understand the frustration as guys sometimes ask me things like "are you full time?," which I would assume to be obvious when I say I'm a ts. That said, outside of a dating context it is a fuzzy line since many transvestites want to transition or end up doing so and also many transsexuals do live "part time" because of life circumstances, even if they're on hormones. Even more significant than that, I think what many men don't realize is the variety of bodies transsexual women live in. Obviously a lot of us have vaginas, which is not what most admirers are interested in, but it goes much further than that.
Even those of us with penises are different in ways that might really matter to what you're looking for. Most men have only seen us in porn and don't realize that the vast majority of pornstars and escorts do not take hormones so they can get hard and ejaculate. I totally understand this because, even with viagra, we would be like all other women in that viewers wouldn't be able to tell if we were faking it (I guess this is the same reason why squirting is so popular). With no testosterone in my body, I still get hard when I'm excited, but nothing comes out when I orgasm. I was explaining this to a guy yesterday and he said he didn't believe me! I was like, "Um, I don't really care if you believe how my body works, especially since you seem to have no understanding of human biology." I'm not a top, so I can't speak to whether being on hormones would be a problem if that was something that really excited me, but most top transsexuals I know say it is. I guess as a bottom I just have a lower bar for my erections
Bottom line, while I agree it makes sense to separate transsexuals and transvestites on dating sites, it's probably not as simple as that
3 out of 3 members liked this post.
-
12-15-2012 #4
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 4,400
Re: TV vs TS
One complication is that the occasional TV deliberately advertises as TS in order to charge the higher rate. e.g. £150/hr instead of £120/hr
-
12-15-2012 #5
Re: TV vs TS
Hi Girls (in the specifically gender sense!),
I've been searching through some general dating sites and when searching I am constantly seeing fat, old men results that I really don't want to see when I am seeking totally hot, rich, perfect men.
Similarly, some guys only like girls who will, like, take care of them sexually, and so a massive flaw continues to exist in the websites.
Who finds this an issue? Who thinks this should not be an issue?
I have very particular tastes and if I didn't have to waste my time being propositioned by blatantly unsuitable prospects, I'd probably be married and be living the perfect life by now.
For the purposes of [sic] superceding discussion, I understand a person who describes himself as a "man" to be height and weight proportionate, with a full head of hair, plenty of muscles, and of course, rich. Others need not apply.
OK... doesn't the above sound totally vapid and self-absorbed?
Did you ever once stop to think that you're not the only person using said sites?
Did you ever think that just perhaps other people like variety or have other tastes than you?
How about taking into consideration that these are PEOPLE that you're talking about and dismissing out-of-hand.
Denial forthcoming, but I'm sure plenty of people have looked at your profile and dismissed it right away or had a chuckle or two at your expense.
It takes all kinds to make the world go around.
My thoughts.
2 out of 2 members liked this post.Grooby Krissy
Shemale Pornstar Blog - Shemale-Strokers Blog - Shemale Punk Blog - Shemale Uniform Blog - British Tgirls Blog - Asia Ladyboy Blog - Black Shemale Blog - Transsexual Post-Op Blog - Ladyboy-Ladyboy Blog - Grooby Network Blog - Shemale Web Review Blog - ...and more!
If you would like to be featured in a blog, please send me 4-6 high quality pictures whenever you have new material to promote. If you would like your site reviewed, please contact me directly. Thank you.
-
12-15-2012 #6
Re: TV vs TS
I'm hungry...
USPSA / IDPA Competition Shooter ° Vegetarian ° Beauty Queen ° Libra ° Investor ° No Bra Club ° Assistant Director of Casino Security
-
12-15-2012 #7
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 3,113
-
12-16-2012 #8
Re: TV vs TS
...because all transvestites eventually become transsexuals? A pair of tits are the only thing that sets them apart? TV's who are part-time would appreciate having to hide their boobs when they aren't in drag? I don't think a proposition like that would work out too well.
-
12-16-2012 #9
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- Raleigh, NC
- Posts
- 66
Re: TV vs TS
Like Krissy said everyone has a place in the world. If they aren't your cup of tea then just pass them by. What may be your Courtney Love might be someone else's Eva Mendez. Just because someone doesn't have certain work done, doesn't change what they identify as. It's all subjective honestly..
3 out of 3 members liked this post.Last edited by HarajukuDollxoxo; 12-16-2012 at 01:55 AM.
-
12-16-2012 #10
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 3,113