Rod Daily tweets hes HIV Postitive

[BigBlackMan]

Don't escort

Don't go around sticking your penis in mold

[BigBlackMan]

humans will be humans thats the problem ... as a model you never really know what other people are upto off camera ..

I escort and because of that there are models in the uk that will not shoot with me ... Yet these same models are plastered all over swinging sites lol .. irony eh

Time for a "career" change.

[GroobySteven]

no i am saying its 0:15 for vaginal and 1:1 for receptive anal creampie in that specific Darren James instance from 2004

You said he has sex with 15-20 girls and 5 of them got HIV?

[christianxxx]

yes all the ones that did anal creampies got the virus, the ones that he had vaginal sex with did not nor did the male performers in group scenes

[broncofan]

both condoms AND testing reduces risk. unfortunately, non condom scenes produce more sales for all companies across the board. ultimately consumers believe no condoms in a scene is a fantasy that they want to see. that fact (or that producers believe its a fact) means non-condom porn will be in demand forever. If condoms are made mandatory and enforced in California, you will see producers move to Vegas, then Miami, then London, then Australia, then the next location. Once Pandora's box has been opened, its not going to close. Again, this isn't for everyone, there are companies who will become 100 percent condom just to get away from the government scrutiny, but the majority of companies will simply figure out a way to get around it.

You're right. Regulating it too hard will only move the business elsewhere. I read on one of these sites that some activists want to eliminate bareback scenes based on work safety type laws. But one thing about work safety is that these laws have never been to make employment as safe as possible. Their purpose is to make work safe to a reasonable degree.

While bareback sex is unsafe for the general population because we don't always know who we're having sex with, in porn the risk is much less. Someone literally needs to be in that window period and given the mandatory testing it is likely to be contained once there's a positive test. While it's far from perfect, there are a great number of industries where the threat to workers' life expectancy is much greater. A risk to be sure, but people are allowed to take those.

[TSLoverIB]

Yeh those numbers do not sound right........ 2004 Zero Porn Stars?

[TSLoverIB]

a test that is 2 days old obviously vastly reduces the possibility that someone is or isn't HIV positive at the time of the test. more tests further back give a better picture of someone's health history.

Rally Cola couldn't be more wrong. That kind of argument is like going into a grocery store, buying a lottery ticket, and thinking you are going to actually win.

Getting infected with HIV isn't that easy to do. Think about this, since we started testing in 1999 and then added clam/gon testing and added syphilis/hep c tests, and some companies have made 14 day tests mandatory...how many scenes do you think have been shot?

a million? 2 million? and there have been ZERO positive HIV transmission cases since 2004. ZERO. Testing works...and will always work.

Rod Daily and Cameron Bay contracted HIV off camera in their private lives. When they wanted to do a scene, the testing clinic caught them, and they are now not allowed to work.

Let me say that again, testing works. ZERO on set HIV transmissions in over 9 years with hundreds of porn scenes shot every day!

Sorry man you seem to be delusional, i think it is safer buying a lottery ticket as you stated, haha. You stated ZERO, so none of your performers have sex with gay or bi porn stars? I hope not, because according to several articles OVER 50-60% of Gay adult stars are HIV+ in 2012. Your risk keeps getting higher, much higher then zero.
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/08/must...rs_get_tested/

[christianxxx]

i am saying that since 2004 zero point zero HIV transmissions have occurred on a porn set

of course they are working with gay or bi porn stars, which helps my point - all of those scenes and again zero point zero HIV transmissions since 2004.

where did I say my risk was zero? huh? surely you don't think i believe that i have zero risk when i shoot a scene whether its condom or not...there is always risk. jesus man

[MrsKellyPierce]

Sex again is dangerous period..why do people love to throw stones when they live in glass houses?

If someone worked in a steel factory there is a chance they will get hurt.

If someone works as a police officer there is a chance they will get hurt.

When you have an abundance of sex whether in the industry or not there is a chance you will get something!

That's just FACTS.

I feel the numbers are pretty damn low for as many scenes we do a year as an industry.

If you have one night stands on the regular and then never get tested you have no room to talk.

If you cheat with a transsexual/female/gay escort and then go home to your wife with out getting tested you have no room to talk.

If you have never been tested at all but have sex regularly you have no room to talk.

Most people never get tested and if they do it's one or two times in their lives or when they are scared.

The sex industry is dangerous in general it's up to each performer to decide as well how safe they feel.

If I saw a male model I thought looked sketchy I didn't perform with him.

I would research his background.

I also expected the test to be taken right before the shoot not the 28 day period. A lot can happen in those 28 days. People have personal lives, escort, could do drugs, and more.

Condoms are a preventative mostly against pregnancy and possibly HIV..it's not the cure all.

Testing is!

Why people are so against testing is beyond me..when free clinics test for free all the time!

I don't understand why this debate goes on and on. Why we point fingers or even why we are surprised an infection gets in!

When someone is working a lot in the industry and then on top of it escorting or having a private life it brings up the chances of EXPOSURE to infection IMMENSELY..

We are going to continue to have these problems no matter what we do!

[LilyRox]

I agree 28 day testing is too damn long. Better than nothing, but still too long. Like you said some of the girls get around daily.