Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 37 of 37
  1. #31
    She RoXXX! Professional Poster LilyRox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Dreamland
    Posts
    1,354

    Default Re: 60 frames a second....holy shit Frank!

    Quote Originally Posted by trish View Post
    I know absolutely nothing about this topic, but this thread has piqued my interest. It seemed to me that filming with a low shudder speed would create some noticeable stroboscopic effects; i.e. wheel going backward etc. I tend to agree with Jamie though in that if your interests are narrative, there may be no need to eliminate these sorts of aberrations (which we're all probably used to anyway). I did a little searching and found this

    http://www.projectorcentral.com/judder_24p.htm

    It's an article which claims that films shot in 24 fps when played on high end blue ray systems which play back at 1080 fps (do I have that right?) suffer from some rather extreme visual distortions. Like I said, I have no dog in this fight. Just thought the article might be relevant to the discussion.
    No, 1080p is the screen resolution of the picture. Fps are how many frames per second there is. 24 fps was the magic number when film was created for sound. There are ways of syncing audio for 48 fps and 60 fps now days though.

    The article is talking about the motion judder you get when filming in low fps like 24 fps. 24 frames per sec sounds like a lot, but it's not compared to our vision and how much we can process in a sec within the real world. I like the little comment in there. "Welcome to 24p" lol.


    Last edited by LilyRox; 07-14-2014 at 07:38 AM.

  2. #32
    Hung Angel Platinum Poster trish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    The United Fuckin' States of America
    Posts
    11,814

    Default Re: 60 frames a second....holy shit Frank!

    Thanks


    1 out of 1 members liked this post.
    "...I no longer believe that people's secrets are defined and communicable, or their feelings full-blown and easy to recognize."_Alice Munro, Chaddeleys and Flemings.

    "...the order in creation which you see is that which you have put there, like a string in a maze, so that you shall not lose your way". _Judge Holden, Cormac McCarthy's, BLOOD MERIDIAN.

  3. #33
    She RoXXX! Professional Poster LilyRox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Dreamland
    Posts
    1,354

    Default Re: 60 frames a second....holy shit Frank!

    Movies try to avoid this a lot with the editing. I have seen tons of fighting movies where you can see this easily though. There are lots of movies out there that have ridiculously fast hand to hand combat scenes where you literally can't hardly see anything because of the motion blur. I also think 48p or 60p would be great for watching real fights like the UFC.



  4. #34
    Senior Member 5 Star Poster Jamie French's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Arlington, TX.
    Posts
    2,692

    Default Re: 60 frames a second....holy shit Frank!

    High frame rate + sports = appropriate use.

    High shutter speed + action scene = appropriate use, (think the opening D-Day scene in Saving Private Ryan.)


    26 lifetime passes left to my site for my face surgery. Help out, gimme your email & I'll make it worth your while. https://life.indiegogo.com/fundraise...-surgery-funds

    My @clips4sale store... updated every day for the next year and a half, starting... NOW. http://clips4sale.com/20182

    http://deadgirlproductions.com/
    http://www.tsjamiefrench.com
    http://www.twitter.com/Jamie_French

  5. #35
    Gold Poster
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    4,426

    Default Re: 60 frames a second....holy shit Frank!

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamie French View Post
    Motion blur looks natural to the human eye. Look around really quickly... shit got blurry for a second didn't it? Nuff said. 24 looks better. anything higher looks like a fever dream and should not be tolerated. .
    This makes perfect sense and jibes with what I've seen. You lose realism by seeing pictures with less motion blur. I also think it changes perspective of the viewer; instead of seeing the image as you would ordinarily see it you are reminded that you are watching something artificial.



  6. #36
    Senior Member 5 Star Poster Jamie French's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Arlington, TX.
    Posts
    2,692

    Default Re: 60 frames a second....holy shit Frank!

    People are largely confusing the terms "real" and "good" and "fake" because they want those words to match how the feel.

    Films look great because they are basically composed of rich, high contrast, color graded images with all sorts off odd, mostly shallow depths of field. Every frame is almost a painting in its own right. This in turn takes you into the land of story telling and imagination when blended with an appropriate frame rate. When the mind is forced to fill in the gaps, the film largely becomes a product of the mind. It becomes internalized. You and the film are one. An immersive experience.

    That's why plays aren't the most popular medium for story telling in this day and age. It's too real, so you are only bearing witness to a story that never really belongs to you. It belongs to the actors and characters on stage. A play can be enjoyable but only in a visceral sense and not in the same way that films are normally enjoyed. A higher frame rate turns movies into plays, or operas... or more appropriately, soap operas, (See? Things are named things for a reason.)

    Quote Originally Posted by broncofan View Post
    This makes perfect sense and jibes with what I've seen. You lose realism by seeing pictures with less motion blur. I also think it changes perspective of the viewer; instead of seeing the image as you would ordinarily see it you are reminded that you are watching something artificial.


    2 out of 2 members liked this post.
    Last edited by Jamie French; 07-14-2014 at 08:46 AM.
    26 lifetime passes left to my site for my face surgery. Help out, gimme your email & I'll make it worth your while. https://life.indiegogo.com/fundraise...-surgery-funds

    My @clips4sale store... updated every day for the next year and a half, starting... NOW. http://clips4sale.com/20182

    http://deadgirlproductions.com/
    http://www.tsjamiefrench.com
    http://www.twitter.com/Jamie_French

  7. #37
    Member Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    32

    Default Re: 60 frames a second....holy shit Frank!

    Interesting thread.
    I would like to add my two-penneth. or should I say two-cents worth?
    Until the advent of Blu-Ray (how many people have this, even now?), we would only see the "filmic look" (24fps) at our local cinema.
    Anything else, on television, whether it is via the broadcasting network or a DVD, would either be in 25fps (PAL - Mostly Europe) or 30fps (NTSC - USA) and interlaced at that!! These framerates generally being governed by the frequency of the electricity supply. PAL=50 Hertz, NTSC=60 Hertz. It is all very complicated, right down to what colours space is used and even the resolutions are different.
    Now HD television has arrived, used in conjunction with Blu-Ray, We can watch films at their original 24fps. So amongst the special fx, the colour grading and the purposeful cinematography of any decent film, did anyone notice the framerate difference? Maybe in USA, since 30fps to 24 fps is a big drop requiring a method of conversion called 3:2 Pulldown. What about in Europe? 25fps to 24fps (film is sped up by an acceptable 4.1%) is hardly noticeable, or is it?
    I think the brain will generally adjust/adapt to whatever the media limitations are, as long as what you watch is entertaining!



Similar Threads

  1. Holy shit hot
    By SXFX in forum The HungAngels Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-03-2014, 08:15 PM
  2. Holy shit!
    By FreddieGomez in forum The HungAngels Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-21-2013, 03:45 AM
  3. holy shit
    By FreddieGomez in forum The HungAngels Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-01-2011, 09:53 PM
  4. HOLY SHIT !
    By FIRSTTIMER in forum The HungAngels Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-05-2009, 06:07 AM
  5. Holy SHIT!!
    By sheyum in forum The HungAngels Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-23-2009, 12:01 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
DMCA Removal Requests
Terms and Conditions