I think it's official Onlyfans has killed the trans porn scene

[Infern0]

I'm still of the opinion that Daisy Taylor in 2018 was the last AAA entry into the trans porn scene and in the 6 going on 7 years since then there hasn't been anyone come into the scene who was on that level. And that includes current Daisy Taylor who is past her prime now if we are being honest.

Most of the hottest trans girls in the adult industry now are exclusively on onlyfans.

I know the Grooby guy will disagree and say he's had all these amazing stars and I'm not trying to be funny here but most of the girls who appear on that site now are mid in my opinion. You certainly can't point to any breakout stars and put them on the level of a Daisy Taylor, a prime Aubrey Kate, Luna Love, Domino etc.

Tbh the only pro stuff I really consume now is some Japanese Jav stuff as they have some extremely attractive trans stars still doing pro stuff.

I don't know how the industry changes this but it feels like rates for pro shoots are going to have to significantly increase to convince these girls to stop making shitty 6 minute amateur clips in their pyjamas and get some real quality going.

But why would they when they can make the same if not more money with all this low effort, low quality stuff on OF.

[Castor_Troy05]

I mean you’re wrong, Emma Rose alone destroys your argument

[filghy2]

You are not the first person here to complain that OF is ruining porn, but it sounds like a gross overstatement to me. There is still plenty of trans porn coming out from the regular sources and plenty of new girls. Maybe it depends what you are looking for. Personally, I like Brazilians and I think the last couple of years have been as good as any for new Brazilian talent.

If more girls are shifting to Only Fans exclusively it must be because they make more money that way, which means there has to be a big market for this stuff. I've only ever subscribed to OF once because I was interested in a particular person, but if it's such low quality and poor value then why would porn consumers be directing more of their dollars there? That doesn't seem to make economic sense.

[Stavros]

As if nobody on this forum has reviewed onlyfans sites which have poor content, or in which the owner asks for one-off payments for explicit sexual intercourse. Then there are the sites which have grainy footage of someone being blown when they wake up in the morning, or an amazon being blown by a guy in a mask or balaclava or whatever is needed to hide his face.

Every industry goes through phases, if the OP is not excited by the latest generation, I am sure others will soon emerge. As for the 'back catalogue', heavens, imagine it is 1984 and you will appreciate how the industrial revolution gave way to the Communications Revolution.

[GroobySteven]

I'm still of the opinion that Daisy Taylor in 2018 was the last AAA entry into the trans porn scene and in the 6 going on 7 years since then there hasn't been anyone come into the scene who was on that level. And that includes current Daisy Taylor who is past her prime now if we are being honest.

Most of the hottest trans girls in the adult industry now are exclusively on onlyfans.

I know the Grooby guy will disagree and say he's had all these amazing stars and I'm not trying to be funny here but most of the girls who appear on that site now are mid in my opinion. You certainly can't point to any breakout stars and put them on the level of a Daisy Taylor, a prime Aubrey Kate, Luna Love, Domino etc.

Tbh the only pro stuff I really consume now is some Japanese Jav stuff as they have some extremely attractive trans stars still doing pro stuff.

I don't know how the industry changes this but it feels like rates for pro shoots are going to have to significantly increase to convince these girls to stop making shitty 6 minute amateur clips in their pyjamas and get some real quality going.

But why would they when they can make the same if not more money with all this low effort, low quality stuff on OF.

I would disagee because you are simply and completely incorrect.

[Discodavis]

Brittney Kade is a huge star. More followers on Instagram than Daisy Taylor and Domino Presley. Most OnlyFans videos are just recorded with a handheld smartphone, in portrait mode and in poor lighting. I don't bother watching low effort, low budget material.

[MrFanti]

I would disagee because you are simply and completely incorrect.

[CadenceCaliber]

While I respect your opinion, this is so subjective. As an avid porn consumer myself, the moment I fall across something super “produced”, I’m navigating away from it in search of something that feels real to me. I think a lot of people prefer something with a more amateur feel. ����♀️ Besides, there are a ton of pro girls doing amazing work these days, as well as OF creators with excellent production quality. That said, it’s also just obvious that we performers are going to gravitate towards a side of the industry where WE have the control, rather than being worked like slaves for a pittance, you know? Just my two cents tho! ��

[Luke Warm]

There are tons of amazing new models coming up all the time. The correct way to understand fan sites in relation to studio shoots is (in my opinion) a symbiotic relationship. Studio shoots bring new people to a model’s fansite. It’s a promotional blast that you can’t get any other way. Content wise, most fansite models don’t have the equipment or skills (or crew) to make content on par with a studio shoot. Just having one other person there specifically to operate the camera makes all the difference. There is technically bad studio porn too. But anyway, fansites and pro studios complement each other, they are not in opposition to each other.