Results 2,221 to 2,230 of 2282
Thread: Thought for the Day
-
04-26-2024 #2221
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 4,426
Re: Thought for the Day
I agree and I regret my post though it wasn't meant as a rebuke to you. I have genuinely felt quite awful about Israel's bombing campaign in Gaza. I can't imagine having a loved one be killed in the kinds of carpet bombings Israel has engaged in and this has taken place for six brutal months. I'm not oblivious to the fact that there is nothing a person can say that could compare to having a limb amputated without anesthetic or disfigurement and pain that will afflict thousands of Palestinians for the rest of their lives. That's all still in my mind when I see these protesters and yet I am still agitated by some of them because frankly, some say things that are meant to threaten and intimidate people who do not have any sort of control over Israel's brutal conduct and haven't condoned it either. But I've actually avoided it for the most part and oddly it's people I know who have never been online who are panicking and sending me videos. It has a distorting effect because people use it as a sample of public perception when it can represent outliers.
When Israel ends its bombardment of Gaza, there will be thousands of innocent people without homes and with life-altering injuries there, among the tens of thousands dead (about half children). That the bombardment ends and soon is my most fervent hope.
-
04-26-2024 #2222
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Posts
- 3,420
Re: Thought for the Day
No doubt this war has brought out more anti-semitism (and Islamophobia), but I'm not sure how much what is happening on campus is really a reflection of anti-semitism rather than the sort of black-and-white 'anti-Western' posturing that has always been a feature of leftist student politics. It's difficult to assess this dispassionately when most of those complaining the loudest about anti-semitism seem to be doing so in bad faith - using it as a device to discredit and suppress opposition to Israel's conduct.
-
04-26-2024 #2223
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 4,426
Re: Thought for the Day
The best way to assess who is using the protesters to discredit opposition to Israel's conduct is to observe who claims there is no merit to criticism of Israel because of the excesses of some protesters. There are people who do that and yes, it's dishonest and disingenuous. But it's not like there are not people acting in bad faith who have attached themselves to the protest movement. On October 7th, I was called a"genocidaire" for simply saying that it is wrong to assert the people killed at the Nova Music Festival were not settlers and had clear civilian status. Does speaking out against the killing of 1,200 civilians before there has been any response mean I support any response? Of course not. Does condemning Israel's response mean one is a Hamas supporter? Of course not. But posting pictures of paragliders does mean that.
It's not really just the student response though. Because I will hear people say that they just want to be able to criticize Israel or condemn atrocities and then I will see thousands of people saying that support for a two-state solution is genocidal, that Palestine can only be free when Israel is gone, and the "Europeans" living there are sent back to Europe. I will see people in the pro-Palestine movement post lists of Zionists that include many people who are Jewish but have not stated much if any view on the conflict at all. Sometimes their culpability is framed in terms of their not speaking out or them one time appearing with someone and so and so.
What I kind of resent is that perfectly reasonable views about International Law, even views that fit within the mainstream, are characterized as bloodthirsty. The guy who runs the Columbia encampment, for instance, said that Zionists should not live and that Zionism necessitates genocide. I don't have any reason to try to characterize his views as the consensus but they are not that rare. And if it's not antisemitic, it does very nearly justify violence against me or others simply for not saying on demand that Israel should cease to exist. I don't see how this is much different from saying any supporter of Palestinians loves Hamas or is a terrorist sympathizer. I would identify that as bigoted. That kind of Islamophobia is done frequently enough but I personally have not argued that that kind of stupidity should be sanctified.
I agree with you that there is black and white anti-western posturing that might not be antisemitic. But it does end up putting a lot of Jewish history into the bin of "European history" which certainly makes more sense than considering Palestinians European but is not exactly the most equitable and accurate way to describe Jewish history.
-
04-26-2024 #2224
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 4,426
Re: Thought for the Day
I don't disagree with you here which is why I have personally tried not to say anything about what is selectively put before me. I think I always have had a problem with people deciding that they will resist any limits to how they protest. Or those who view any calls for limits to the acceptable means of protest as hiding a secret desire to see their cause fail (in this case, I suppose it depends on the goals but I don't wish any harm to anyone). People frequently want to invoke something exceptional about their current circumstances to justify extreme actions, but in recent memory most protests that have spilled into violence or vandalism have had harmful consequences. Most. I'm not saying all and I know there are noteworthy counter-examples.
When Nick Danger tried to compare protests against police brutality to the insurrection, there were a ton of problems with the comparison. One is that police brutality is a real problem and the insurrectionists manufactured their claims. The second one is that while arson is very bad in my view, it is not an imminent threat to ordered liberty the way invading a capitol building to prevent certification of a lawful vote is. But I didn't go for defund the police, whatever its proponents claimed it meant and I've always thought that wantonly damaging property tended to be the actions of someone acting out of personal angst rather than for their cause. Do I think "From the river to the sea" means genocide as some pro-Israel people have claimed? No. I don't. I do think the paraglider stuff is closer to a red line for me. For me because I think it's sadistic.
I also recognize the enormous hypocrisy of free speech absolutists wanting to punish speech. It is many right-wing people and a decent percentage of vocal supporters of Israel who claimed this maximalist position and now want to censor speech in centers where expression and debate are most valued. You know, they are idiots. And I think there is too much I don't know about college political movements but I think I probably wouldn't like some of it even if I had 1000 percent alignment with the cause.
-
04-27-2024 #2225
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Posts
- 3,420
Re: Thought for the Day
I agree with most of what you say. Blaming all Jewish people for the actions of the Israeli government does constitute a form of anti-semitism. It is also inexcusable to deny or justify the atrocities of Hamas just because they oppose a government whose policies you object to.
This article mentions some more examples of poor behaviour by some protestors.
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...cissist-allies
It's hard to say how representative this is of the protest movement, but the organisers should do more make clear they don't support this kind of thing. Apart from anything else, it undermines the cause that they say they are fighting for.
Unfortunately, all of this seems to be part of the human tendency to take sides and then ostracise anyone not seen as being on the right side, while excusing bad actions of those who are seen as fellow travellers.
1 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
04-27-2024 #2226
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Posts
- 3,420
Re: Thought for the Day
Israel is seen this way because it is supported by the US and most of the settlers in recent history came from Europe and the US. As always, a lot of radical leftists want to view everything through a lens of opposition to Western capitalist 'imperialism'. This leads to a tendency to support (or at least excuse) anyone resisting the West. This leads to some odd contradictions because Hamas and other Islamic fundamentalist organisations actually have more in common with authoritarian Christian fundamentalists on the right.
-
04-27-2024 #2227
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 12,004
Re: Thought for the Day
The question to ask might be why this conflict has generated so much public protest, but not the savage war taking place in Sudan? The war in the Yemen has not become a public issue, and for much of the time neither was the war in Syria.
It might be that because the protests over the intention to change the regime in Iraq gave voice to people who Blair and Bush then ignored, a lot of people think there is no longer any purpose to demonstrations : the people have become irrelevant, as some right wing thinker once said at a public meeting after 9/11. Al-Qaeda never cared what people think; HAMAS doesn't care, Israel doesn't care. And it remains to be seen if those 'young people' so angered by the US support for Israel will abandon Biden in November. If a week is a long time in politics, 7 months is close to eternity.
It means that apart from being a nuisance and in the worst cases, a genuine threat to Jews on campus, maybe elsewhere too, the demonstrations achieve nothing where it matters, in the Middle East.
I wonder -are these demonstrations being co-ordinated? Maybe the organizers should consider scaling back their events, though the issue of intimidations and threats may be harder to deal with.
Dare I say this will all pass? At some point for the students essays and exams will be more important than howling at the moon.
-
05-01-2024 #2228
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 969
Re: Thought for the Day
There has always been faction of leftist politics that has been antisemitic. I also believe there has always been a fine line between being pro-Palestinian and antisemitic. Since the attacks of October 7th and the subsequent war, that line has been crossed on many occasions.
Being from NYC, which is a center of leftist politics and where there are protests taking place on few college campuses, I think what is happening is a combination of antisemitism, mixed with the good old fashioned anti-western beliefs. It’s not uncommon to see flyers on lampposts advertising an upcoming protest with some of those beliefs. Occasionally you will see the words anti-Zionism thrown in with the classics. You know, anti-capitalism, anti-imperialism, revolution, and in recent years, defunding the police, abolish ICE, and prisons.
1 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
05-02-2024 #2229
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 12,004
Re: Thought for the Day
I think a lot might depend on now the left is defined, particularly in the US. This study, while flawed, documents the twists and turns of ideas and political activism in the US. I would like to suggest the experience in the UK and parts of Europe has been different, but that would be a very long and tedious post.
Antisemitism and the American Far Left | Reviews in History
-
05-02-2024 #2230
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Posts
- 3,420
Re: Thought for the Day
It could equally be said that there is a fine line between being pro-Israel and anti-Palestinian, and that line has been crossed on many occasions.
As I said, it's unfortunate that some bad elements have got involved because this undermines the cause of protesting against Israel's excesses. The protest movement should do more to disown the extremists. But targeting the whole movement because of the actions of a minority isn't likely to achieve this; more likely it will have the opposite effect. In the past heavy-handed attempts to crack down on protestors seem to have led to more radicalisation.
https://www.vox.com/politics/2414163...-state-history
We now tend to have a romanticised view of the Vietnam war protestors because subsequent developments have put them on the right side of history, but there was also plenty of bad behaviour back then. Most people now think the US involvement in Vietnam was wrong, but the protests don't seem to have been popular at the time, given they helped Nixon win two elections.
1 out of 1 members liked this post.Last edited by filghy2; 05-02-2024 at 02:55 AM.
Similar Threads
-
just a thought
By Rebecca1963 in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 12-29-2010, 05:51 PM -
Just a thought
By bellamy in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 35Last Post: 08-12-2009, 06:06 AM -
I never thought I would do this...
By daleach in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 3Last Post: 10-25-2008, 10:01 AM -
Never given this much thought
By Hara_Juku Tgirl in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 32Last Post: 04-05-2008, 05:05 PM -
I had thought......
By blackmagic in forum The HungAngels ForumReplies: 11Last Post: 05-16-2007, 04:09 AM