Quoting site stats has got to go...

[Jamie French]

Precisely because they are JUST numbers. But Kim treats them as if anyone is impressed with bad fact checking in the pursuit of some misguided popularity contest. It goes on and on... it's like watching someone yell at the top of their lungs that water is not wet and you just want to DROWN them.

Jamie I like u, u r a singer and composer like me, why do u care about kim´s server stats anyways, they r just numbers

[sammitv]

Precisely because they are JUST numbers.

Jamie... you are a right twat.

If the numbers didn't stand for anything, why would Alexa, Google Analitics and Ranking.com etc spend millions developing their websites?

You are just jealous that Kim's Alexa Rank is higher that yours. You simply can't get over that fact.

Seems funny that Liberty Harkness posted her Alexa Stats here the other day, and not ONE word from YOU slagging her off.

Jamie, you just have it in for kim... PERIOD. Its about time you grow up and stop using this forum to slag off people you don't like.

If you don't like reading Kim's or Libby's numbers..... then DON'T FUCKING READ THEM!

Personally, the more Kim posts her stats, then all the better. It certainly seems to wind you up big time. Its so funny watching you fall into her trap, every time!!

PS: have you checked Kim's rank on www.ranking.com 65,5000th

Oh and I checked your rank. Oh look its right down at: 946,000th

Pathetic!!!

[Jamie French]

Looks like you fell for MY trap!

Jamie... you are a right twat.

If the numbers didn't stand for anything, why would Alexa, Google Analitics and Ranking.com etc spend millions developing their websites?

You are just jealous that Kim's Alexa Rank is higher that yours. You simply can't get over that fact.

Seems funny that Liberty Harkness posted her Alexa Stats here the other day, and not ONE word from YOU slagging her off.

Jamie, you just have it in for kim... PERIOD. Its about time you grow up and stop using this forum to slag off people you don't like.

If you don't like reading Kim's or Libby's numbers..... then DON'T FUCKING READ THEM!

Personally, the more Kim posts her stats, then all the better. It certainly seems to wind you up big time. Its so funny watching you fall into her trap, every time!!

PS: have you checked Kim's rank on www.ranking.com 65,5000th

Oh and I checked your rank. Oh look its right down at: 946,000th

Pathetic!!!

[sammitv]

Kim is the finest ts on HA. Nobody can compare to her.

Now that's gotta wind Jamie up!!

No doubt Kelly will now say that BigBlackMan is really Kim!

Can't Jamie see that Kim is posting her stats on her just to piss her off?

After the initial reaction Kim got, she must have fell about laughing when Jamie posted her rants about stats etc.

Hope you checked your LOW rankings on www.ranking.com, Jamie

Such a shame

[Jamie French]

I care about conversions. MY conversions. Those are the only numbers worth caring about. When it comes to Kim, what I care about is the validation of ego driven spam by misunderstood stats. It's one thing to be proud of quality work and updating your wares when you have something new that you put a lot of work into, it's another thing to be a walking bill board whose only message is LOOK AT ME! Then when somebody says dial it back a notch, nonsensical numbers are thrown about as justification.

Let's see the conversion rates, a weekly check statement, a Google analytic something OTHER than hit counts.

Want my numbers? I make about $300 every Thursday - that's $1200/month supplicant income on top of my job editing porn and drawing pictures. I'm perfectly happy with that number because I'm more than happy with the quality of my work and the people I get to wok with to make it happen. In 5 years I haven't had to leave home to hold down a day job... why would hit counts even matter to me at that point?

[BellaBellucci]

The metric you guys and girls are looking for is 'unique visitors.' What's the number on that? Membership numbers would be helpful here as well. Jamie's assessment in the OP is spot on.

Can't Jamie see that Kim is posting her stats on her just to piss her off?

BigBlackMan is the sockpuppet of the sockpuppet troll known as LittleGuy.

~BB~

[woodywoodsac]

Jamie is only pissed that she will never look as good as Kim does

For a dude that wears a wig, "she" certainly knows how to give a convincing performance as shown in this video. Click to play!

[woodywoodsac]

The metric you guys and girls are looking for is 'unique visitors.' What's the number on that? Membership numbers would be helpful here as well. Jamie's assessment in the OP is spot on.

Just looked at Kim's stats by using her Stats collection page:
http://kimsanalheaven.com/stats/stats

Looks like she has had 895,399 Unique Visitors in the last 5.5 months.

Number of visits: 1,144,141 in the same period.

Can we see you Stats page please Jamie? Do you have any? No?

Can we also see your bank statements to prove those income figures you just quoted please?

The originals, not the photoshopped ones?

As if.....

[BigBlackMan]

The metric you guys and girls are looking for is 'unique visitors.' What's the number on that? Membership numbers would be helpful here as well. Jamie's assessment in the OP is spot on.



BigBlackMan is the sockpuppet of the sockpuppet troll known as LittleGuy.

~BB~

Why are you so negative all the time? You need to grow up.

[BellaBellucci]

Just looked at Kim's stats by using her Stats collection page:
http://kimsanalheaven.com/stats/stats

Looks like she has had 895,399 Unique Visitors in the last 5.5 months.

Number of visits: 1,144,141 in the same period.

OK. 'Spot on' was too strong. Apparently, the numbers are in question, but the fact that the average visit was around three minutes and most of the bandwidth was from the tour pages speaks volumes, so Jamie was still on to something. That's why memberships will always be the most important metric.

Why are you so negative all the time? You need to grow up.

Lulz@ you trying to take the high-road.

~BB~